Published on Commens (http://www.commens.org)

Home > Quote from "Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism: Lecture III"

Commens
Digital Companion to C. S. Peirce
‘Secondness’ (pub. 09.01.13-19:36). Quote in M. Bergman & S. Paavola (Eds.), The Commens Dictionary: Peirce's Terms in His Own Words. New Edition. Retrieved from http://www.commens.org/dictionary/entry/quote-harvard-lectures-pragmatism-lecture-iii-2.
Term: 
Secondness
Quote: 

Category the Second has a Degenerate Form, in which there is Secondness indeed, but a weak or Secondary Secondness that is not in the pair in its own quality, but belongs to it only in a certain respect. Moreover, this degeneracy need not be absolute but may be only approximative. Thus a genus characterized by Reaction will by the determination of its essential character split into two species, one a species where the secondness is strong, the other a species where the secondness is weak, and the strong species will subdivide into two that will be similarly related, without any corresponding subdivision of the weak species. For example, Psychological Reaction splits into Willing, where the Secondness is strong, and Sensation, where it is weak; and Willing again subdivides into Active Willing and Inhibitive Willing, to which last dichotomy nothing in Sensation corresponds. But it must be confessed that subdivision, as such, involves something more than the second category.

Source: 
Peirce, C. S. (1903). Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism: Lecture III. MS [R] 308.
References: 
CP 5.69
Date of Quote: 
1903
URL: 

http://www.commens.org/dictionary/entry/quote-harvard-lectures-pragmatism-lecture-iii-2